Skip to content
AI Data Payout

Updated October 2026

License a closing startup's data to AI buyers

Independent and sourced. We feature companies that pay us a referral fee. Our scores and reviews don't change for it. How we earn

MIT Technology Review counts more than 150 data deals for wound-down startups through SimpleClosure, and Forbes put the typical deal at $10K-$100K.1

Founder packing up a nearly empty startup office with a laptop open on a desk

When a startup shuts down, the last few weeks are spent on payroll, investors, customers and the dissolution paperwork. The Slack workspace, Google Drive, Notion, Jira and GitHub organization are usually the last things anyone thinks about, and often get deleted when the card on file stops being charged. Until recently they had no buyer. Now they do.

AI labs and data intermediaries buy the full working record of a company that no longer needs it: years of product debates, code reviews, customer calls written up, hiring decisions and launch plans. MIT Technology Review reported in October 2026 that AI labs are buying data from startups that have shut down, and counts more than 150 such deals through SimpleClosure, a wind-down service. Mercor has pursued shuttered startups' Slack and Jira archives, and micro1 has advertised to people who ran a company that is no longer operating.

This page is for founders, board members, investors and wind-down advisers of venture-backed and bootstrapped startups with ten or more people at their peak. It covers what sells, the prices that have been reported, which buyers fit, and what to raise with the buyer and the board before anything is transferred. The closing-your-company guide covers the wider process.

data deals for wound-down startups through SimpleClosure (MIT Technology Review)

150+1

data deals for wound-down startups through SimpleClosure (MIT Technology Review)

typical price per SimpleClosure deal (Forbes)

$10K-$100K1

typical price per SimpleClosure deal (Forbes)

of Slack, Jira and email sold by Cielo24

13 years4

of Slack, Jira and email sold by Cielo24

employees at peak, micro1's rule in its closed-company ads

25+5

employees at peak, micro1's rule in its closed-company ads

Worth

What a startup's data may be worth

Set for a typical startup, 30 staff and 5 years of records. Move the sliders to match yours. Our estimate, not an offer.

Buyers

Which buyers want this data

Buyers whose own published rules fit startups that are winding down or have closed. We can introduce you to the ones we work with.

Featured partners

  1. #1 in our ranking

    8.7 out of 10

    micro1

    Has run ads to people whose company is no longer operating, for US companies that had 25+ employees at their peak.5

    Typical payout
    $100K to $2M+, micro1 says6

    Watch out for: Says it removes personal details only "when relevant", so ask exactly how.10

Everyone else we reviewed

By score, with full reviews. We have no referral agreement with these companies, so we do not link out to them.

  1. #3 in our ranking

    7.1 out of 10

    Mercor

    Has pursued shuttered startups' Slack and Jira archives, and approached Warmly after its acquisition.11,12

    Typical payout
    Mercor does not publish a range13
    Fees
    None, Mercor says14
    Time to get paid
    By wire 2 to 4 weeks after signing15

    Watch out for: It confirmed a cyberattack in 2026, and class actions followed.16,17

  2. #9 in our ranking

    6.1 out of 10

    SimpleClosure

    Runs a wind-down service with an asset hub for data, with 150+ deals reported, and says code, Slack, email and docs are in scope.1,2

    Typical payout
    Usually $10K to $100K for a closed startup1

    Watch out for: Built for startups that are shutting down, so deals are smaller.1

  3. #10 in our ranking

    5.8 out of 10

    Troveo

    Names production code with commits, reviews and bug history, often the most valuable asset a software startup leaves.18

    Typical payout
    Six figures and up for a whole company, Troveo says19
    Fees
    A share of the revenue; the percentage is not published20

    Watch out for: You are paid from a revenue share, so ask what percentage you keep.20

We feature buyers that pay us a referral fee. Our scores and reviews don't change for it. How we earn. No buyer publishes prices by industry, so within each group the order is the same as in our main ranking.

Who wants this

Do buyers want startups that are winding down or have closed?

No buyer publishes prices by industry, but their own intake forms show which industries they rate higher.

  • Troveo puts developer tools, data and AI infrastructure, and cybersecurity in its top demand tier, and business and consumer apps in its third.21,22
  • Polyshares takes software and saas, without marking it premium.23
  • VMS, a broker, gives software or tech extra weight when it estimates value.24

Which buyers take a startup your size

Shown for 30 staff, a typical startup. Ask whether contractors and part-time staff count.

  • micro1We can introduce you

    30+ employees (its partnership page says 30 to 200)25,26

    Takes 30 staff

  • PolysharesWe can introduce you

    No headcount rule; the length and texture of the record matter more27

    No size floor

  • ModeWe can introduce you

    20+ full-time US office staff (accounting firms 10+, law firms 6+)28

    Takes 30 staff

  • PewterWe can introduce you

    20+ staff and 3+ years; by industry, from 10+ (healthcare) to 50+ (manufacturing, finance)29,30,31

    Takes 30 staff

  • GreppedWe can introduce you

    No headcount minimum stated32

    No size floor

  • VentraWe can introduce you

    30+ US employees and 3+ years of records33

    Takes 30 staff

  • Mercor

    None stated34

    No size floor

  • Troveo

    No minimum stated; its estimator starts at 2035

    No size floor

  • Nyne

    20+ US W-2 employees and 3+ years36

    Takes 30 staff

  • Endless

    Roughly 30+ employees37

    Takes 30 staff

  • Supersoniq

    50+ employees and 5+ years38

    Too small at 30 staff

What buyers value

What in a startup's records buyers value

What buyers look for in your records, and what to talk through with your buyer before anything leaves your systems.

What in a startup's records buyers value
DataWhere it livesWhy a buyer values itRaise with the buyer
Slack or Teams workspaceSlack, Microsoft TeamsYears of decisions made in the open: product debates, launches, incidents, hiring.Private DMs, HR channels and anything about named employees' health or pay.
Code repositoriesGitHub, GitLabCode with review and bug history; a closed crypto startup's code base alone sold for about $25,000.Customer data in fixtures, and open-source components.
Jira or Linear historyJira, LinearEvery feature and bug from idea to release, linked to the code.Nothing specific
Docs, wiki and design filesNotion, Google Drive, FigmaStrategy memos, PRDs and designs; a crypto startup's Google, Notion, Figma and Slack data was offered after its code sold.Nothing specific
Email and CRMGmail, HubSpot, SalesforceSales conversations, investor updates and customer support from the company's whole life.Customer and investor personal details.

Process

How it works with each buyer

In each buyer's own words. Where a buyer publishes nothing, we say so.

micro1

What it buys
Internal docs, SOPs and playbooks, knowledge bases, project management workflows, internal comms, templates, CRM and workflow metadata, task histories39
Who qualifies
30 to 200 employees26
Offer range
$100K-$2M+ per data package; over $1M for unique data6
Personal data
PII removed "when relevant"10
Ownership
The company keeps ownership of its data and reviews samples before release40
Time to payment
Not published

Mercor

What it buys
Slack, Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Confluence, Salesforce, GitHub, Drive, Notion and 100+ other tools41
Who qualifies
Not published
Offer range
Not published13
Fees
No fees14
Security
SOC 2 Type II42
Time to payment
Wire 2-4 weeks after signing15

SimpleClosure

Who it serves
150+ data deals for wound-down startups, typically $10K-$100K each1
What is in scope
Sensitive employee and health records are excluded; code, Slack, email and docs are in scope2

Troveo

Deal structure
Licensing, not sale, on a revenue share (percentage not published)20
First step
Free value assessment, then scoping43

Selling or closing

Selling or closing your startup? License its data first

This page is the exit section. If the company is closing, the order matters: data that is deleted when subscriptions lapse cannot be licensed afterwards. SimpleClosure says sensitive employee and health records are excluded while code, Slack, email and docs are in scope. Ask each buyer who must sign for the company once it is dissolving, how proceeds reach the right people, and how long the process takes before the workspace is switched off.2,3

FAQ

Startups winding down: questions, answered

  • Buyers are active now. MIT Technology Review counts 150+ data deals for wound-down startups through SimpleClosure, Mercor has pursued shuttered startups' Slack and Jira archives, and MIT Technology Review reported AI labs buying data from startups that have shut down.1,11,44

  • Forbes reported SimpleClosure's deals at $10K-$100K each. Cielo24 sold 13 years of Slack, Jira and email for "hundreds of thousands of dollars". A closed crypto startup sold its code base for about $25,000, with about $15,000 for workspace data pending.1,4,9

  • From 2026-10-09 micro1 ran ads headed "Your previous company's data could be worth up to $2M", aimed at US companies that had 25+ employees at their peak. Up to $2M is micro1's own ceiling, not a typical price.5

  • Yes, several. Pewter, License My Data and micro1's closed-company ads all ask about companies that are no longer operating, and SimpleClosure works with startups as they wind down.45,46,5,1

  • Rules vary, from 20 to 50 or more people at the company's peak, and SimpleClosure works with startups at any stage.5,46,47,1

  • Talk to a buyer first. aitrainer.work notes that Slack, Google Workspace and GitHub organizations get deleted after non-payment, and suggests paying until a buyer has sampled. A crypto startup's workspace data was offered separately after its code sold.3,48

  • Every business is different, so this one is best talked through with the buyer you're working with. Their team goes over it with you before anything is signed.

  • Every business is different, so this one is best talked through with the buyer you're working with. Their team goes over it with you before anything is signed.

Before you sign

Every business is different, so these are best talked through with the buyer you're working with. Their team goes over them with you before anything is signed.

Questions for this kind of business

  • Who signs for the company during a dissolution or an assignment for the benefit of creditors?
  • How are employee DMs, HR channels and personal data excluded?
  • Which customer contracts restrict data that sits in tickets, logs or Slack?
  • Who owns this data: the company, an estate, or someone else?
  • How are employee data, union contracts and NLRA questions handled?
  • What are the trustee's, assignee's, receiver's or board's duties, and who receives the proceeds?
  • Which proceeding fits: an ABC, Chapter 7, Chapter 11 or a dissolution?

Questions for any buyer

  • Is the license exclusive, and for how long?
  • Can you sublicense the data, and to whom?
  • Which AI labs will receive it, and will you tell us?
  • How long do you keep it, and how is it deleted?
  • What is your liability cap, and who indemnifies whom?
  • Will the contract ban re-identification of people in the data?
  • Who removes personal data, by what method, and do we approve it first?

Proof

Deals in this kind of business

  • Cielo24 sold 13 years of Slack, Jira and email for "hundreds of thousands of dollars" (Forbes reporting, via AI Weekly).4
  • A closed crypto startup sold its code base for about $25,000, with about $15,000 for workspace data pending (MIT Technology Review).9

How this page was made

Figures come from the published sources listed below, and what a buyer says about itself is its own claim. Anything marked as our estimate is ours, not a buyer quote. Drafted with AI help from our research, then checked against each source. Updated October 2026.

We feature companies that pay us a referral fee. Our scores and reviews don't change for it. See how we earn and how we rank. This site does not give legal, tax or financial advice.

Sources (48)

  1. 1.Forbes, published 16 Apr 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  2. 2.SimpleClosure press release (Business Wire), published 3 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  3. 3.aitrainer.work, closed company page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  4. 4.AI Weekly, summarising Forbes (16 Apr 2026). Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  5. 5.Meta Ad Library, micro1 page, published 9 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  6. 6.micro1 company referral page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  7. 7.Polyshares website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  8. 8.Bloomberg Law, published 17 Aug 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  9. 9.MIT Technology Review, published 13 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  10. 10.beri.net, published 10 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  11. 11.AI Weekly, summarising The Information, published 15 Aug 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  12. 12.AI Weekly, summarising The Information, published 15 Aug 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  13. 13.Mercor Data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  14. 14.Mercor Data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  15. 15.Mercor Data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  16. 16.TechCrunch, published 31 Mar 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  17. 17.HR Dive, published 13 Apr 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  18. 18.Troveo, license company data for AI, published 20 Aug 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  19. 19.Troveo business data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  20. 20.Troveo, published 11 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  21. 21.Troveo business data assessment. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  22. 22.Troveo business data assessment. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  23. 23.Polyshares intake catalog. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  24. 24.VMS data licensing page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  25. 25.micro1 company referral page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  26. 26.micro1 Enterprise Data Partnership page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  27. 27.Polyshares. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  28. 28.Mode company data site. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  29. 29.Pewter website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  30. 30.Pewter partner update to AI Data Payout (email, 2026-10-15), published 15 Oct 2026. Accessed 15 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  31. 31.Pewter partner update to AI Data Payout (email, 2026-10-15), published 15 Oct 2026. Accessed 15 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  32. 32.Grepped business page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  33. 33.Meta Ad Library, Ventra page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  34. 34.Mercor Data. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  35. 35.Troveo business data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  36. 36.Nyne sell-company-data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  37. 37.Endless website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  38. 38.Supersoniq website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  39. 39.micro1 Enterprise Data Partnership page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  40. 40.beri.net, published 10 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  41. 41.Mercor Data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  42. 42.Mercor Data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  43. 43.Troveo, published 11 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  44. 44.MIT Technology Review, published 13 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  45. 45.Pewter website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  46. 46.License My Data website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  47. 47.Pewter. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  48. 48.MIT Technology Review, published 13 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.