Skip to content
AI Data Payout

Selling data

Can my employer sell my data? What employees should know

Some employers are licensing staff's old work emails and Slack messages to AI companies, mostly when a company closes or goes bankrupt. Whether your employer may do this is a legal question we do not answer. What we can say: buyers usually strip names first, the money rarely reaches staff, and unions have objected in court.1,2,3,4,5

By Lead analyst (to be named) · reviewed by Reviewing editor (to be named) · published 14 Oct 2026 · updated 18 Oct 2026

What is actually happening

In April 2026 a Futurism headline, citing Forbes, put it bluntly: your former employer is selling your Slacks and emails to train AI. MIT Technology Review later reported AI labs buying data from startups that had shut down. Searches like "can my employer sell my data" now show up in Google's suggestions.1,2,6

The biggest case is Spirit Airlines. Its bankruptcy sale covers about 100M emails, 500M Teams items and 175,658 employee records going back to 1986. Google won the auction, and the court has not yet ruled.7,8,9

Operating companies are doing it too, not just closed ones. micro1, for example, says it licenses internal communications from businesses with 30 or more staff.10,11

What is usually included, and what is taken out

Work messages are the main thing: email, chat and documents. Buyers say they remove or swap names and personal details before the data is used. Nyne's ads say names are swapped for codes. Polyshares uses an outside firm to scrub data first.12,13,3

HR and health records are often left out. SimpleClosure never sells sensitive employee and health records. In the Spirit case, Google agreed to drop timecard data, and micro1's rival offer proposed destroying raw employment records after processing.14,15,16

Removing names is not a perfect shield. A study found 99.98% of Americans could be re-identified from 15 traits, and researchers have pulled exact passages, including names and email addresses, out of AI models' training data.17,18

Who gets the money

Usually not the people who wrote the messages. For a closed startup, MIT Technology Review reports that the proceeds typically go to senior creditors and investors, not employees. In an operating company, the payment goes to the company.4,19

That is the part people find hardest. In online discussion of the Forbes story, most commenters were hostile: workers wrote the messages and see none of the money. Others replied that the company owns what staff produce at work. We do not take a side on ownership; that is a legal question.20

What employees have done about it

At Spirit, staff took it to court. The flight attendants' union asked to exclude their information. Other unions and the pilots objected too, and the pilots warned that people could stop using confidential safety reporting if they might be identified.5,21

Lawmakers joined in: 121 members of Congress wrote to Spirit's and Google's chief executives. A consumer privacy ombudsman was appointed to look after personal data in the sale.22,23

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Buyers say they usually remove or swap names before data is used.13,3
  • Some buyers never take sensitive employee or health records.14
  • In court sales, staff and unions can object and be heard.5

Cons

  • The money typically goes to creditors, investors or the company, not staff.4
  • People can sometimes be re-identified from cleaned data.17
  • AI models can repeat some training text, including names.18
  • It does not stop when a company closes: shut-down startups' archives are sold too.2

What it means for a business like yours

If you own a business and are thinking about a data deal, your staff will ask the questions on this page. A law firm's checklist for sellers starts with bringing in HR and communications, not just the legal team. Telling people early, and explaining what is removed, costs little.24

Consider leaving out what staff care about most: HR files, health records and private messages. SimpleClosure already excludes sensitive employee and health records, and Nyne's ads say any folder can be left out.14,25

Should your business get in now?

Businesses are already licensing their records: micro1 has committed $1B over 12 months to buying company data, and at least 18 firms started advertising for it between September and mid-October 2026.26,27 Our view, not a promise: the money will not be around forever, because prices tend to come down as more businesses sell.26,28 Take the quiz to see which firms fit your business.

Plus a free Seller's Guide when you finish.

We feature companies that pay us a referral fee. Our scores and reviews don't change for it. How we earn.

FAQ

Questions, answered with sources

  • Every business is different, so this one is best talked through with the buyer you're working with. Their team goes over it with you before anything is signed.

  • Some are, mostly after a company closes or goes bankrupt. Futurism, citing Forbes, reported former employers selling staff Slacks and emails to train AI.1,2

  • Usually it is removed or swapped first. Nyne's ads say names become codes; Polyshares uses an outside scrubbing firm. Re-identification is still possible.13,3,17

  • Rarely. For closed startups, proceeds typically go to senior creditors and investors, not employees, MIT Technology Review reports.4

  • Often not. SimpleClosure excludes sensitive employee and health records, and in the Spirit case Google dropped timecard data.14,15

  • Employees have objected. In the Spirit Airlines sale, the flight attendants' union asked to exclude their information, and other unions and the pilots objected.5,21

  • Ask which records are included, who removes personal details and how, whether HR and health records are left out, and which AI company receives the data.14,3,29

  • Every business is different, so this one is best talked through with the buyer you're working with. Their team goes over it with you before anything is signed.

Before you sign

Every business is different, so these are best talked through with the buyer you're working with. Their team goes over them with you before anything is signed.

Questions for this kind of business

  • How are employee data, union contracts and labor-law questions handled in this deal?
  • How do CCPA, GDPR, UK GDPR and state privacy laws apply, and is de-identified data still personal information?
  • How are employee data, union contracts and NLRA questions handled?

Questions for any buyer

  • Is the license exclusive, and for how long?
  • Can you sublicense the data, and to whom?
  • Which AI labs will receive it, and will you tell us?
  • How long do you keep it, and how is it deleted?
  • What is your liability cap, and who indemnifies whom?
  • Will the contract ban re-identification of people in the data?
  • Who removes personal data, by what method, and do we approve it first?

How this page was made: drafted with AI help from the sources below, each checked; a buyer's claims about itself are its own. Updated October 2026. How we rank.

Sources (29)

  1. 1.Futurism (citing Forbes), published 25 Apr 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  2. 2.MIT Technology Review, published 13 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  3. 3.Polyshares website. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  4. 4.MIT Technology Review, published 13 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  5. 5.Chapter11Cases (Stretto) docket report on the Spirit data sale, published 13 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  6. 6.Google autocomplete (our check). Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  7. 7.Chapter11Cases (Stretto) docket report on the Spirit data sale, published 13 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  8. 8.Chapter11Cases (Stretto) docket report on the Spirit data sale, published 13 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  9. 9.Skift, published 12 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  10. 10.micro1 Enterprise Data Partnership page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  11. 11.micro1 company referral page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  12. 12.Mercor Data page. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  13. 13.Meta Ad Library, Nyne.ai. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  14. 14.SimpleClosure press release (Business Wire), published 3 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  15. 15.Chapter11Cases (Stretto) docket report on the Spirit data sale, published 13 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  16. 16.Fortune, published 14 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  17. 17.Rocher, Hendrickx and de Montjoye, Nature Communications, published 23 Jul 2019. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  18. 18.arXiv (Carlini et al.), published 14 Dec 2020. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  19. 19.beri.net, published 10 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  20. 20.Slashdot discussion, published 18 Apr 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  21. 21.Skift, published 12 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  22. 22.Skift, published 12 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  23. 23.Chapter11Cases (Stretto) docket report on the Spirit data sale, published 13 Sep 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  24. 24.Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, published 1 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  25. 25.Meta Ad Library, Nyne.ai. Accessed 14 Oct 2026. Company's own claim.
  26. 26.The Next Web, published 9 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  27. 27.Meta Ad Library (our review). Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  28. 28.TechCrunch, published 16 Sep 2025. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.
  29. 29.MIT Technology Review, published 13 Oct 2026. Accessed 14 Oct 2026.